This is utterly bizarre to me, and whether it reflects a mistake on Technorati’s behalf or the oddities and eccentricities of those blogging about Yale, I have no idea.这是毫无奇怪，对我来说，和它是否反映一个错误就来Technorati的代表，或宠物频道和偏心率，这些博客约耶鲁大学，我不知道。 I found myself looking at the我发现自己看在 Technorati tag page来Technorati的标签页 for the tag “Yale” and found some really weird results.为标记的“耶鲁” ，并发现一些真正奇怪的结果。 To see if it was a fluke, I looked at the pages for the other ivy league schools, and for “ivy league.” Brown was muddled by Brown of FEMA fame, but there were some obvious “related tags” there: “Harvard, Princeton, Columbia, Ivy League.”地看到，如果是福禄克，我期待在页面为其他长春藤盟校，并为“常春藤名校”布朗是糊涂由布朗紧急名利，但也有一些明显的“相关标签”有： “哈佛，普林斯顿大学，哥伦比亚，常春藤名校“ 。

Perfectly sensible.绝对明智的。 Princeton and Dartmouth were the same, just linking to the other schools for their “related tags.” Those who bothered to write about Harvard were more concerned with other pursuits, like video games, music videos, and TV.普林斯顿大学和达特茅斯都是一样的，只要连接到其他学校，为他们的“相关标签。 ”谁烦写哈佛更加关注与其他的追求，如视频游戏，音乐影片，和电视。 No matter.不管。 Yet Yale…? These are the actual tags as of 8/31/06, go check for yourself: “Sex, Books, Sexblogs, Publishers, Novels, Erotica, Sexual Revolution, Lesbian, Bisexual, Publishing.”然而，耶鲁大学… … ？ 这些都是实际的标签截至8/31/06 ，去检查自己： “性别，书籍， sexblogs ，出版商，小说，情色，性革命，女同性恋，双性恋者，出版” 。

Huh?吧？ This could be a case of a tiny sample size skewing results (relatively few blogs post about Yale and other things, perchance), I have no idea.这可能是一个案件一小样本规模拉动的结果（相对较少的博客后约耶鲁大学和其他的东西， perchance ） ，我不知道。 It’s really strange.这真是奇怪。 Just goes to show the sort of weird online presence you can get unofficially…刚才正好说明这类怪异的网上存在，你可以得到内定…