04 Feb 2月 4 日
Posted by Sam Jackson as張貼薩姆傑克遜 Internets 網際網路 , , Student Life 學生生活 , , Teenagers 青少年
Teachers, educators, and librarians sometimes ponder the possible uses of Facebook as an education tool; students and teachers alike talk about the awkwardness and occasional utility that arises from online social networking interactions between-groups.教師,教育工作者,和圖書管理員,有時想想可能用途的臉譜作為一種教育工具,學生和老師都談論尷尬和偶爾公用事業源自網上社交網絡互動-群體。 The Education Committee of Missouri has weighed in with a proposal which paints its picture using a giant “sex offenders are everywhere, trying to sneak into our schools” brush.教育委員會密蘇里權衡在同一項提案,其中塗料,其圖片用一個巨大的"性犯罪者到處都有,試圖潛入我們的學校"一刀切。 The該 Columbia Missourian 哥倫比亞missourian reports:報告:
Teachers would be restricted from connecting with students on Web sites such as Facebook under a proposal by the House Education Committee chairwoman.教師會受到限制,從他與學生網站,如Facebook的下一項提案是由眾院教育委員會主席。
The Education Committee added a section to a bill Wednesday regarding teacher-student interaction on social networking Web sites that parents cannot access.教育委員會補充說:一節一項法案週三對於教師與學生的互動社交網絡網站,家長不能進入。
The umbrella bill, aimed at keeping sexual offenders from teaching in Missouri schools, would prohibit teachers from using a “non-work-related Internet site” to communicate with students where third parties have no access.傘條例草案,旨在讓性犯罪者,由教學,在密蘇里州的學校,會禁止教師使用"非與工作有關的互聯網網站" ,以便與學生需求,而第三各方都沒有獲得。 In other words, parents need to see profiles.或者換句話說,家長要看到剖面。
“Rep. "眾議員 Jane Cunningham, R-St.簡坎寧安的R -聖。 Louis, committee chairwoman and sponsor of the bill, said its purpose is to protect children from offenders that school administration cannot catch.” Thus, to protect children from the very small fraction of would-be teachers who might possibly be sex offenders or otherwise have villainous intentions for the youth of Missouri, a whole potential range of social interactions are set to be neutered.路易,委員會主席和贊助該條例草案時說,它的目的是保護兒童免受罪犯說,學校行政不能趕上" ,因此,為了保護兒童免受很小一部分將成為教師的人可能是性罪犯或以其他方式真小人的意圖,為青年的密蘇里州,整個潛在的各種社會互動,是為了被絕育。 Why not ban e-mail, telegraphs, or carrier pigeons, too?為什麼不禁止電子郵件,電報,或者承運人鴿子,太?
There’sa joke in here somewhere about Missouri being the “Show Me State” but I’m not even going to search for it, because this is just so poorly calculated in my mind–the goal and the means to achieving that goal seem very disconnected and its reminiscent of the deeply misinformed national debate on so many “protect the children from the scary internet” stories in Washington.有一個笑話,在這裡某處約密蘇里州正在"顯示我的國家" ,但我並沒有,甚至為了尋找它,因為這只是這麼差計算,在我心-目標,是手段,以實現這一目標似乎十分斷開及其使人想起了深深錯誤的全國性辯論,對這麼多的"保護兒童免受恐怖互聯網"的故事在華盛頓舉行。 Thoughts?思量嗎? Christian基督教 , other teachers and外,其他教師和 educators教育工作者 , your opinions especially wanted. ,你的意見特別是通緝。 Faculty + facebook — always學院+臉譜-永遠 no go圍棋 ? ?
2 Responses 2個答复
Ryan 瑞安
February 7th, 2008 at 1:28 am 2008年2月7日,在上午01時28分
1 一I think the real question for faculty and staff is: what is there to gain by connecting with students via Facebook (and similar social networking sites) that can’t be achieved in other ways?我認為真正的問題,為教職工是:有什麼好處連接與學生經臉譜(以及類似的社會網絡網站)表示,不能用其他方式實現嗎?
I believe that faculty and staff members (and future employers, and parents!) should not ever use Facebook to communicate with their students.我相信教職員工(和未來的雇主,與家長! ) ,不應該永遠用臉譜溝通學生。 Period.期。 It wasn’t intended for interaction between students and faculty, but for interaction amongst friends, and we should all respect those boundaries.它不是為了互動,學生和教員,但互相交流的朋友,我們都應該尊重這些界限。
Should that be legislated?如果是這樣的立法呢? No way.沒有辦法。 It’s unenforcable and won’t actually do anything to stop predators, most of whom –are known– to their victims.它的unenforcable並不會做任何事去阻止獵食者,其中大多數-已知到他們的受害者。 This legislation sounds like just another attempt to draw attention away from the real issues, which are so much more complicated than INTARWEBS BAD.這條法例,好像只是企圖再次提請大家注意遠離真正的問題,它們是那麼多比過去更加複雜intarwebs壞。
Food for thought: check out the發人深思:簽出 Digi-Drama about Fear 2.0數碼戲約2.0恐懼 presented at this year’s ELI 2008 conference regarding the “stranger danger” movement and the opportunities we might be denying our students by oversimplifying the risks and rewards of social networking.在今年的艾力2008年大會關於"陌生人危險"的運動和機會,我們可能會否定我們的學生過分簡化的風險和報酬的社會網絡。
Sam Jackson 薩姆傑克遜
February 7th, 2008 at 10:31 pm 2008年2月7日於下午10時31分
2 二Thanks so much for commenting, Ryan!感謝這麼多作評論,瑞安! What do you think of my hope to draw from the faculty / staff / marketer part of the site readership to provide scholarships to the student half?您怎麼看,我希望借鑒醫學院/員工/營銷的一部分,該網站的讀者,以提供獎學金,學生一半? : ) ( : ) ( link here連接在這裡 ) )
The question that arises in my mind from your comment is: What about where faculty and friend overlap?出現的問題,在我看來,從你的評論是:請問哪裡師生和朋友重疊? I’m friends with my residential college dean on facebook, and comment on the nice photos she tags of me from Trumbull events; although I know e-mail is a more reliable way to get in touch with her (or office appointments), to me, sending a message on facebook is pretty similar to walking up to her in the dining hall and asking something.我的朋友與我的住宅學院的院長對臉譜和評論尼斯照片,她的標籤,我由Trumbull事件;雖然我知道,電子郵件是一個更可靠的方式取得聯繫的,她(或辦公室任命) ,以我發送了一條信息臉譜是相當相似, 1914年她在宴會大廳,並要求一些事。 …and why not parents? … …以及為什麼沒有父母? My mom would have some idea of what my friends and I were up to if were were all hanging out at my house watching movies, what’s such a big difference?我的媽媽有一些想法是什麼,我的朋友和我自己了,假如人都掛在我家看電影,有什麼這麼大的差別? I am totally aware of the potential for abuse in any and all of these situations (and know people who have had troublesome incidents for each category!) but I would hesitate, personally, to make a total generalization or prescription.我完全意識到有可能被濫用,在任何及所有這些情況(和知道的人,有麻煩的事件,為每一類! ) ,但我會毫不猶豫地,我個人來說,作出總的概括或處方。
RSS feed for comments on this post RSS訂閱評論這個職位 · TrackBack URI跟踪的URI
Leave a reply留下一個答复
Pages頁
Translate翻譯
Archives檔案
Related相關
Supporting Links支持鏈接