Apr 17, 2008
Watch how Yale deals with a giant crisis! (Aliza Shvarts ‘08 & abortion art) [UPDATE: Fake, performance art!]
UPDATE: Was performance art in and of itself.
New Haven, Conn. — April 17, 2008
Ms. Shvarts is engaged in performance art. Her art project includes visual representations, a press release and other narrative materials. She stated to three senior Yale University officials today, including two deans, that she did not impregnate herself and that she did not induce any miscarriages. The entire project is an art piece, a creative fiction designed to draw attention to the ambiguity surrounding form and function of a woman’s body.
She is an artist and has the right to express herself through performance art.
Had these acts been real, they would have violated basic ethical standards and raised serious mental and physical health concerns.
So there you have it: the University offered a quick explanation after initiating an investigation. Original post follows.
I will be watching to see how Yale deals with what will certainly explode (is exploding) into a huge controversy: as reported by the Yale Daily News, a senior art project is soon to be presented in which a student continually inseminated herself and then forced miscarriages, preserving the blood and filming the process.
Beginning next Tuesday, Aliza Shvarts ‘08 will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself “as often as possible” while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.
The goal in creating the art exhibition, Shvarts said, was to spark conversation and debate on the relationship between art and the human body. But her project has already provoked more than just debate, inciting, for instance, outcry at a forum for fellow senior art majors held last week. And when told about Shvarts’ project, students on both ends of the abortion debate have expressed shock — saying the project does everything from violate moral code to trivialize abortion.
No, not a joke. {Update, 10 hours after the fact: Yes, actually a hoax! Thankfully.}
I tuned into a webinar about crisis management over the summer hosted by Karine Joly’s Higher Ed Experts, and saw some interesting insight into how schools can manage crises.
Too bad that Michael Dame, director of Web and Communications at Virginia Tech, won’t be giving his webinar about online crisis management for a few weeks. Yale could use some advice right about now, I think. This story has already hit Drudge report, and the YDN has been having some trouble with the traffic.
Oh, also? Yale is just about to host a big climate change conference with governors from the US, premiers from Canada, nobel laureates, etc.
Let’s watch the ensuing negative PR explosion… more on this as things develop.
If you want to check the temperature of the blogosphere or interwebs at large, you can see just a really, really furious reaction bubbling up. Antisemitic pro-choicers seem to be some of the nastiest commentators.
Because the YDN site is having problems with traffic, the full article is available after the break. For a sample of her other artwork, check a piece in Dimensions magazine (Yale publication) from January.
UPDATE: In addition to Drudge, it is now on the front page of Fox News, under “Outrage Over ‘Self-Abortion Art’” — fantastic. Lots of quotes from the National Right to Life Committee people.
UPDATE2: In addition, I should add that it’s also been on Jezebel (more than once), Gawker, Perez Hilton, … and many more. That’s a lot of eyeballs.
UPDATE3: I would additionally note that it is still worth considering the plausibility of this account, effectiveness rates for the herbs in question, and general health risks rendering it more or less likely that it was possible to undertake this. However, the YDN is not one to make up stories like this, so I am going to wait and see how it plays out more before calling “hoax” on it.
Martine Powers, Staff Reporter, Thursday April 17, 2008. “For senior, abortion a medium for art, political discourse.”
Art major Aliza Shvarts ‘08 wants to make a statement.
Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself “as often as possible” while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.
The goal in creating the art exhibition, Shvarts said, was to spark conversation and debate on the relationship between art and the human body. But her project has already provoked more than just debate, inciting, for instance, outcry at a forum for fellow senior art majors held last week. And when told about Shvarts’ project, students on both ends of the abortion debate have expressed shock . saying the project does everything from violate moral code to trivialize abortion.
But Shvarts insists her concept was not designed for “shock value.”
“I hope it inspires some sort of discourse,” Shvarts said. “Sure, some people will be upset with the message and will not agree with it, but it’s not the intention of the piece to scandalize anyone.”
The “fabricators,” or donors, of the sperm were not paid for their services, but Shvarts required them to periodically take tests for sexually transmitted diseases. She said she was not concerned about any medical effects the forced miscarriages may have had on her body. The abortifacient drugs she took were legal and herbal, she said, and she did not feel the need to consult a doctor about her repeated miscarriages.
Shvarts declined to specify the number of sperm donors she used, as well as the number of times she inseminated herself.
Art major Juan Castillo ‘08 said that although he was intrigued by the creativity and beauty of her senior project, not everyone was as thrilled as he was by the concept and the means by which she attained the result.
“I really loved the idea of this project, but a lot other people didn’t,” Castillo said. “I think that most people were very resistant to thinking about what the project was really about. [The senior-art-project forum] stopped being a conversation on the work itself.”
Although Shvarts said she does not remember the class being quite as hostile as Castillo described, she said she believes it is the nature of her piece to “provoke inquiry.”
“I believe strongly that art should be a medium for politics and ideologies, not just a commodity,” Shvarts said. “I think that I’m creating a project that lives up to the standard of what art is supposed to be.”
The display of Schvarts’ project will feature a large cube suspended from the ceiling of a room in the gallery of Green Hall. Schvarts will wrap hundreds of feet of plastic sheeting around this cube; lined between layers of the sheeting will be the blood from Schvarts’ self-induced miscarriages mixed with Vaseline in order to prevent the blood from drying and to extend the blood throughout the plastic sheeting.
Schvarts will then project recorded videos onto the four sides of the cube. These videos, captured on a VHS camcorder, will show her experiencing miscarriages in her bathrooom tub, she said. Similar videos will be projected onto the walls of the room.
School of Art lecturer Pia Lindman, Schvarts’ senior-project advisor, could not be reached for comment Wednesday night.
Few people outside of Yale’s undergraduate art department have heard about Shvarts’ exhibition. Members of two campus abortion-activist groups . Choose Life at Yale, a pro-life group, and the Reproductive Rights Action League of Yale, a pro-choice group . said they were not previously aware of Schvarts’ project.
Alice Buttrick ‘10, an officer of RALY, said the group was in no way involved with the art exhibition and had no official opinion on the matter.
Sara Rahman ‘09 said, in her opinion, Shvarts is abusing her constitutional right to do what she chooses with her body.
“[Shvarts' exhibit] turns what is a serious decision for women into an absurdism,” Rahman said. “It discounts the gravity of the situation that is abortion.”
CLAY member Jonathan Serrato ‘09 said he does not think CLAY has an official response to Schvarts’ exhibition. But personally, Serrato said he found the concept of the senior art project “surprising” and unethical.
“I feel that she’s manipulating life for the benefit of her art, and I definitely don’t support it,” Serrato said. “I think it’s morally wrong.”
Shvarts emphasized that she is not ashamed of her exhibition, and she has become increasingly comfortable discussing her miscarriage experiences with her peers.
“It was a private and personal endeavor, but also a transparent one for the most part,” Shvarts said. “This isn’t something I’ve been hiding.”
The official reception for the Undergraduate Senior Art Show will be from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. on April 25. The exhibition will be on public display from April 22 to May 1. The art exhibition is set to premiere alongside the projects of other art seniors this Tuesday, April 22 at the gallery of Holcombe T. Green Jr. Hall on Chapel Street.

What you are calling a public relations crisis is actually only truth being made public.
This art project is ultimately only an outgrowth of a particular worldview that thinks this kind of thing is acceptable. This worldview permeates our elite institutions.
Only now that something like this has happened and the consequences of the ideas promoted in these academic circles are made public is the situation thought of as a crisis. Well, there is a crisis, but it is a crisis of spirit and intellect, not of image.
I disagree with your assumptions and characterizations, but whether this is “truth made public” or not, it can certainly be characterized as a very tricky public relations issue for Yale in a year which has seen some turbulent other stories, from racist and antisemitic graffiti to misogynist actions by a frat…
Why is it a tricky public relations issue?
This is only going to get worse if the media descends upon Yale tomorrow (which they will because of the potential major policy statement by Schwarzenegger tomorrow), they will be met by an image of Yale at its silliest and most elitist: TAP NIGHT. Tomorrow is the night when the “best” of Yale dress up in ridiculous costumes and run drunkenly around Yale doing stupid things en route to being inducted into their secret society.
@ Dean: The same way it was an issue for Brown when Sex Power God got coverage on Fox. The year after that, when I visited, they even made a point to try to do damage control about it on their campus tours… this could easily turn into something like that. It is a public relations issue because it is something that will attract a lot of negative attention for the University and especially because there will be fingers pointed at Yale for approving and–I would imagine–funding her senior project. I can’t imagine there *not* being protests at the gallery.
@deep: That’s what bothers me, too–it’s that there will be this extra attention and scrutiny. I saw NH ch 8 up by Sage Hall today because of the art project that the forestry school put together, and just sort of scoping things out in general in advance of the climate governor’s conference… but tomorrow, when there is arnold + several other governors + several canadian premiers etc… yeah.
Just to clarify, this story turned out to be an elaborate piece of performance art on Aliza’s part. Fake. However, Yale will still smart from negative attention and we should watch to see what goes on further, as this still has more to play out, I think…
[...] Because most of us have probably heard of the controversial Yale art project, [the Sam Jackson College Experience] clears things up. [...]